Timeline for Submitting papers “out of logical order” due to different review times or rejections
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Feb 1, 2019 at 12:34 | comment | added | Jan-Christoph Schlage-Puchta | I think it is a good question at the wrong forum. I vote for closing, but encourage the OP to copy the question to academia stackeschange. On one hand the question is not about mathematics, on the other hand the interesting content is relevant to other sciences as well. | |
| Feb 1, 2019 at 0:05 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 6, 2019 at 17:28 | |||||
| Nov 29, 2017 at 18:27 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 30, 2017 at 9:22 | |||||
| Oct 22, 2017 at 18:54 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 23, 2017 at 6:29 | |||||
| May 27, 2012 at 9:40 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by S. Carnahan♦ | ||
| May 27, 2012 at 8:28 | answer | added | Federico Poloni | timeline score: 12 | |
| May 27, 2012 at 1:37 | comment | added | JRN | I think this question is more appropriately asked at academia.stackexchange.com | |
| May 27, 2012 at 1:33 | comment | added | Misha | Does not look like there is a problem at all, I had 3 papers which were accepted (after rejections) in the reverse logical order. Was the 2nd paper accepted by the same journal that rejected the 1st one? If not, then submit the 1st paper to the same journal and carefully explain the situation in a letter to the editors, i.e., that validity of the accepted 2nd paper hinges on the 1st paper. Presumably, they will be sympathetic. Even if it was the same journal, write to the editor-in-chief and explain carefully absurdity of the situation, see if they send the 1st paper to different referees. | |
| May 26, 2012 at 23:38 | answer | added | Karl Schwede | timeline score: 17 | |
| May 26, 2012 at 23:18 | history | asked | Anonymous | CC BY-SA 3.0 |