Timeline for Constructing an icosahedral weight 2 eigenform?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
Sep 6, 2012 at 22:20 | answer | added | Reza | timeline score: 0 | |
Jun 8, 2012 at 8:49 | comment | added | Chandan Singh Dalawat | @David: "This website/URL [pastebin.com/qEcuv7EF] has been blocked until further notice either pursuant to Court orders or on the Directions issued by the Department of Telecommunications" | |
Jun 6, 2012 at 17:59 | comment | added | David Loeffler | Update: the Magma bug is now fixed, and the fix will appear in the next patch release of Magma at the end of this month. | |
May 31, 2012 at 22:07 | vote | accept | Barinder Banwait | ||
May 30, 2012 at 10:02 | answer | added | David Loeffler | timeline score: 7 | |
May 28, 2012 at 9:31 | comment | added | David Loeffler | Here is a Sage code snippet that produces the q-expansion of the level 133 non-dihedral eigenform (just a linear combination of the basis vectors for the space that Kevin gives): pastebin.com/qEcuv7EF | |
May 27, 2012 at 14:36 | comment | added | Kevin Buzzard | It's funny that the magma code doesn't work because I thought they just pasted my code in, and my code works fine for these weights (as far as I can see -- it gives answers and doesn't crash at any rate!). Barinder: if you want to see the level 133 form then download www2.imperial.ac.uk/~buzzard/char0results.m . Take a look at it -- should be self-explanatory. | |
May 27, 2012 at 10:35 | comment | added | David Loeffler | I just ran a test of computing weight 1 modular forms for levels $\le 200$ with Magma, and found two other bugs in addition to this one (it fails for $N \in \{112, 124, 133, 136, 148, 168, 171, 180, 196\}$. I've sent them a full bug report. | |
May 27, 2012 at 9:39 | comment | added | David Loeffler | If Magma is really dying when you ask it to compute the level 133 form, then you should send in a bug report -- the Magma folks are very good about fixing bugs quickly. | |
May 27, 2012 at 3:03 | comment | added | Chandan Singh Dalawat | It will be nice if some kind soul computes the $q$-expansion of the weight-$133$ tetrahedral form and posts it below Kevin's answer (mathoverflow.net/questions/97624/…). | |
May 26, 2012 at 18:59 | history | asked | Barinder Banwait | CC BY-SA 3.0 |