Timeline for commuting elements in a reductive group
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 4, 2012 at 16:51 | vote | accept | Adam | ||
May 26, 2012 at 1:43 | vote | accept | Adam | ||
May 26, 2012 at 5:19 | |||||
May 26, 2012 at 1:43 | vote | accept | Adam | ||
May 26, 2012 at 1:43 | |||||
May 26, 2012 at 1:43 | comment | added | Adam | SO(3,C) is the group of 3x3 complex matrices A such that A \cdot A^T=I and det(A)=1. | |
May 25, 2012 at 16:55 | answer | added | Jim Humphreys | timeline score: 9 | |
May 25, 2012 at 0:15 | answer | added | Angelo | timeline score: 13 | |
May 25, 2012 at 0:08 | history | edited | Jim Humphreys |
edited tags
|
|
May 25, 2012 at 0:04 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | The choice of algebraically closed field doesn't really seem to matter here. Also, I think it's safe to assume the group is semisimple (and of course connected, which is implicit). You need semi-simple to make "simply connected" meaningful. This case is treated explicitly in the part of Springer LN 131 written by Springer and Steinberg: II, 5.1, where they note the importance of the simply connected assumption. Finally, I'm not sure what your SO(3,C) means in this context, so I don't quite follow your last sentence. | |
May 24, 2012 at 22:59 | history | edited | Adam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 110 characters in body
|
May 24, 2012 at 22:42 | history | asked | Adam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |