Timeline for Height of ideal in graded ring
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 24, 2012 at 20:54 | comment | added | Thomas Kahle | Hi variety, that's not a stupid question. The case only $ht(I) = ht(I')$ occurs when $I$ is already homogenous. I excluded that case in the beginning: I assumed that $p$ is non graded (and I'll also assume that $I$ is not graded, otherwise everything is trivial). We get $\text{ht}(IR_{(0)}=1$ since only the zero ideal has height zero and $IR_{(0)}$ is not the zero ideal since it contains a non-homogeneous element. | |
May 24, 2012 at 18:35 | comment | added | variete | Dear Thomas Kahle, in the last line of your answer, you concluded that $\text{ht}(I)=\text{ht}(I')+1$, but we have to prove that $\text{ht}(I)\le\text{ht}(I')+1$ and why do we get $\text{ht}(IR_{(0)})=1$ ? I am so sorry if you feel my question is stupid. Thank you very much for your answer. | |
May 24, 2012 at 10:25 | comment | added | Thomas Kahle | I've updated my answer. | |
May 24, 2012 at 10:24 | history | edited | Thomas Kahle | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
More detail on the reduction to the prime case.
|
May 23, 2012 at 15:31 | comment | added | variete | Sorry, but in your answer you has just dealt with only prime ideal. My question is about a general ideal. | |
May 23, 2012 at 12:36 | history | answered | Thomas Kahle | CC BY-SA 3.0 |