Timeline for Mayer-Vietoris implies Excision
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
2 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2012 at 2:43 | comment | added | Paul Siegel | This is very promising! The specific functor I care about actually is defined on pairs, and I think it is even true that $h_n(X,A) = h_n(C_A X, pt)$ as you stipulate. I'll try this idea... | |
| May 22, 2012 at 9:08 | history | answered | Lennart Meier | CC BY-SA 3.0 |