Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
May 20, 2012 at 3:21 vote accept Akhil Mathew
May 17, 2012 at 14:05 answer added Peter May timeline score: 7
May 16, 2012 at 7:23 comment added M T arxiv.org/abs/0911.0638 may be of interest
May 16, 2012 at 5:23 comment added Tyler Lawson The symmetric groups have complicated cohomology taken individually, but taken all together the homology possesses extra structure (Dyer-Lashof operations) that makes it simple to describe. A nice reference, if I remember correctly, is Bisson and Joyal's "Q-rings and the homology of the symmetric groups." (preprint here: hopf.math.purdue.edu/Bisson-Joyal/Luminy.pdf)
May 16, 2012 at 3:37 comment added Akhil Mathew (I haven't had a chance to read the paper yet, but I guess from there that the homology of symmetric groups is pretty complicated?)
May 16, 2012 at 0:12 comment added Akhil Mathew Thanks for the correction and the reference to the paper.
May 16, 2012 at 0:12 history edited Akhil Mathew CC BY-SA 3.0
added 18 characters in body
May 15, 2012 at 23:03 comment added Theo Johnson-Freyd I believe that "I'm interested in the homotopy groups of the free simplicial commutative ring on Let $X_\bullet$ be a simplicial set" should probably be "I'm interested in the homotopy groups of the free simplicial commutative ring on A SIMPLICIAL SET. Let $X_\bullet$ be a simplicial set". Is this correct?
May 15, 2012 at 19:15 comment added John Wiltshire-Gordon I think some computations of higher homotopy groups of spheres can be rephrased as the derived functors of symmetric powers: arxiv.org/abs/1103.4580v1
May 15, 2012 at 19:10 history asked Akhil Mathew CC BY-SA 3.0