Timeline for Open source LaTeX lecture notes/slides/books
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2012 at 1:53 | comment | added | Scott Carter | In another thread, Gireaux asked that the source code be made available for the use of the blind. This is reason enough to do so, in my opinion. | |
| May 11, 2012 at 20:48 | comment | added | timur | Charles Staats comments to the OP nicely captures what I mean by the extra effort. | |
| May 11, 2012 at 20:41 | comment | added | timur | I guess what I was trying to say is that it is not worth the extra effort to publish the source code, when the PDF is already of a low quality. | |
| May 11, 2012 at 20:19 | comment | added | evf | I've also heard this argument, although I don't see the difference between releasing a PDF or the source file in this case. If the source code is not useful, because the document is of such low quality, then why would the PDF be? | |
| May 11, 2012 at 20:02 | history | answered | timur | CC BY-SA 3.0 |