Timeline for Does the "measure-preserving property" commute with ultralimits ?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 10, 2012 at 19:40 | vote | accept | js21 | ||
May 10, 2012 at 19:40 | vote | accept | js21 | ||
May 10, 2012 at 19:40 | |||||
May 10, 2012 at 15:51 | comment | added | Nik Weaver | Let $f_n \in l^\infty({\bf Z})$ be the bi-infinite sequence which is zero between $-n$ and $n$, and one outside that interval. This sequence converges weak* to the zero sequence, but each $f_n$ evaluates to 1 along any nonprincipal ultrafilter. So evaluating on any nonprincipal ultrafilter cannot be a normal linear functional on $l^\infty({\bf Z})$. | |
May 10, 2012 at 15:44 | comment | added | Jon Bannon | @Nik: I suspected so. How does one get that every nonprincipal ultrafilter isn't normal (a reference will do)? | |
May 10, 2012 at 15:35 | answer | added | Nik Weaver | timeline score: 5 | |
May 10, 2012 at 15:25 | comment | added | Nik Weaver | A non-normal pure state on $l^\infty({\bf Z})$ is the same as a non-principal ultrafilter on ${\bf Z}$. | |
May 10, 2012 at 13:35 | comment | added | Jon Bannon | There should exist a non-normal pure state on l^{\infty}(\mathbb{Z}), and that should provide you with a counterexample. I hope this helps. | |
May 10, 2012 at 10:35 | history | asked | js21 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |