Skip to main content

Timeline for Action Integral

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 18, 2015 at 5:52 answer added Zurab Silagadze timeline score: 1
May 16, 2015 at 15:35 answer added Machinato timeline score: 3
Jan 18, 2014 at 14:41 history edited Ricardo Andrade CC BY-SA 3.0
replaced tag 'tag-removed' (if you make an edit to an old question, please make it count!)
S Jan 18, 2014 at 5:27 history suggested Felix Marin CC BY-SA 3.0
I put some \left and \right commands into the integral expressions and change it to a paragraph style.
Jan 18, 2014 at 4:11 review Suggested edits
S Jan 18, 2014 at 5:27
May 8, 2012 at 10:43 comment added Yemon Choi Well, my feeling on seeing the name Kepler and seeing the form of the final answer was that there must be an ellipse involved...
May 8, 2012 at 4:10 vote accept Raymond
May 8, 2012 at 4:09 comment added Raymond The transformation suggested by Yemon Choi is very useful. First of all, it gets rid of the square-root singularities at the endpoints, so the numerical integration is easier for arbitrary potentials. It is also closely related to the rational parameterization mentioned by the other commenters, since I think $\theta = \phi/2$ where $\phi$ is the azimuthal coordinate of the circle introduced by Igor.
May 7, 2012 at 15:19 answer added Igor Khavkine timeline score: 10
May 7, 2012 at 12:20 comment added Américo Tavares To reduce an integral of the type $$\int R\left( x,\sqrt{ax^{2}+bx+c}\right) dx$$ to an integral of a rational function one may use the so called Euler substitutions. See Euler substitutions, L.D. Kudryavtsev (originator), Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: encyclopediaofmath.org/….
May 7, 2012 at 9:21 comment added Yemon Choi I've never tried this particular integral, but off the top of my head I would start by trying $r=a+(b-a)\sin^2 \theta$. Then double angle formulae. Did you already try this?
May 7, 2012 at 4:55 comment added David Roberts When you say 'derive this', what are referring to? The formula for $I$, or some general transformation technique? If the former, I'm afraid MO isn't the site for such questions, see the FAQ for a detailed explanation why.
May 7, 2012 at 4:21 history asked Raymond CC BY-SA 3.0