Timeline for Categorical description of the restricted product (Adeles)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2012 at 16:53 | comment | added | Marc Palm | Glad that you found my solution helpful, but Keith Conrad's reference Goldman and Sah is something I was not aware of. | |
| May 9, 2012 at 16:40 | comment | added | Konrad Voelkel | @Mrc Plm: Thank you! So the solution of my headache was to see the infinitely many conditions as a colimit over finitely many conditions. That could work in other settings, too. @Ryan Reich: Thanks for the suggestion, I like Tate's symbol. | |
| May 9, 2012 at 16:37 | vote | accept | Konrad Voelkel | ||
| May 7, 2012 at 6:45 | comment | added | Marc Palm | tex.stackexchange.com/questions/21644/… | |
| May 7, 2012 at 6:45 | comment | added | Marc Palm | \mathrlap{coprod}\prod should do, see e.g. here... | |
| May 7, 2012 at 2:33 | comment | added | Chandan Singh Dalawat | ... short of writing a macro to superpose $\prod$ and $\coprod$. | |
| May 7, 2012 at 2:30 | comment | added | Chandan Singh Dalawat | I like that symbol for the restricted product. How do you code for it in TeX or LateX ? | |
| May 6, 2012 at 19:07 | comment | added | Ryan Reich | I've seen Tate write the restricted product as $\rlap{\prod}\coprod$; i.e. a product combined with a coproduct, just as you decsribe it. | |
| May 6, 2012 at 18:00 | history | edited | KConrad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| May 6, 2012 at 15:47 | history | edited | Marc Palm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 79 characters in body
|
| May 6, 2012 at 15:38 | history | edited | Marc Palm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 155 characters in body
|
| May 6, 2012 at 15:23 | history | answered | Marc Palm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |