Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

typo
Source Link
Goldstern
Goldstern
  • 14k
  • 1
  • 47
  • 71

If Ed Dean's suggestion ("Foundations of Set Theory" by Fraenkel, Bar-Hillel and Levy) is to heavy for you, have a look at "Intermediate Set Theory" by Drake and Singh. One chapter describes/discusses several different axiomatizations and (Zermelo-Fraenkel, Neumann-Bernays-Gödel, Morse-Kelly, Montague-Scott, Quine, Ackermann).

If Ed Dean's suggestion ("Foundations of Set Theory" by Fraenkel, Bar-Hillel and Levy) is to heavy for you, have a look at "Intermediate Set Theory" by Drake and Singh. One chapter describes/discusses several different axiomatizations and (Zermelo-Fraenkel, Neumann-Bernays-Gödel, Morse-Kelly, Montague-Scott, Quine, Ackermann).

If Ed Dean's suggestion ("Foundations of Set Theory" by Fraenkel, Bar-Hillel and Levy) is to heavy for you, have a look at "Intermediate Set Theory" by Drake and Singh. One chapter describes/discusses several different axiomatizations (Zermelo-Fraenkel, Neumann-Bernays-Gödel, Morse-Kelly, Montague-Scott, Quine, Ackermann).

Post Made Community Wiki by Kim Morrison
expanded list of other axiomatizations
Source Link
Goldstern
Goldstern
  • 14k
  • 1
  • 47
  • 71

If Ed Dean's suggestion ("Foundations of Set Theory" by Fraenkel, Bar-Hillel and Levy) is to heavy for you, have a look at "Intermediate Set Theory" by Drake and Singh. They describe One chapter describes/discussdiscusses several different axiomatisationsaxiomatizations and (ZFCZermelo-Fraenkel,NBG Neumann-Bernays-Gödel,MK Morse-Kelly, Montague-Scott, Quine, Ackermann).

If Ed Dean's suggestion ("Foundations of Set Theory" by Fraenkel, Bar-Hillel and Levy) is to heavy for you, have a look at "Intermediate Set Theory" by Drake and Singh. They describe/discuss several different axiomatisations (ZFC,NBG,MK).

If Ed Dean's suggestion ("Foundations of Set Theory" by Fraenkel, Bar-Hillel and Levy) is to heavy for you, have a look at "Intermediate Set Theory" by Drake and Singh. One chapter describes/discusses several different axiomatizations and (Zermelo-Fraenkel, Neumann-Bernays-Gödel, Morse-Kelly, Montague-Scott, Quine, Ackermann).

Source Link
Goldstern
Goldstern
  • 14k
  • 1
  • 47
  • 71

If Ed Dean's suggestion ("Foundations of Set Theory" by Fraenkel, Bar-Hillel and Levy) is to heavy for you, have a look at "Intermediate Set Theory" by Drake and Singh. They describe/discuss several different axiomatisations (ZFC,NBG,MK).