Timeline for Lawvere theories versus classical universal algebra
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2022 at 6:14 | history | edited | David Roberts♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed arxiv front-end link and gave full published reference with doi link
|
| Nov 30, 2012 at 15:54 | comment | added | Aaron Mazel-Gee | Ah, so I think the point is that there's no a priori reason that up-to-homotopy models (in $\mbox{Top}$) for the abelian group Lawvere theory should give rise to $E_\infty$-spaces. And of course, this result immediately implies that not all $E_\infty$-spaces can be written as homotopy models. | |
| Nov 27, 2012 at 12:46 | comment | added | Akhil Mathew | Hi Aaron. I never spent much time with Badzioch's paper and didn't think about it further, but your question makes me curious. I'll look at it again and see if I can figure it out. | |
| Nov 27, 2012 at 0:47 | comment | added | Aaron Mazel-Gee | I just looked briefly at Badzioch's paper and wondered about the exact same thing that you bring up in your last paragraph. Did you ever sort this out? | |
| May 2, 2012 at 14:28 | history | answered | Akhil Mathew | CC BY-SA 3.0 |