Timeline for connected compact semisimple lie group finite fundamental group
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 2, 2012 at 1:48 | comment | added | Igor Rivin | Thanks, I will check it out! Part of my question is which proof is the quickest from nothing... | |
May 2, 2012 at 1:04 | comment | added | Faisal | The first 'equality' follows from the observation that the complex of left invariant forms computes $H^\ast_{\rm dR}(G)$ (not difficult to prove) together with the fact that said complex can be identified (via evaluation at the identity) with the complex $\wedge^q\mathfrak g^\ast$. You can find all the details in, e.g., Chevalley--Eilenberg. | |
May 2, 2012 at 1:03 | comment | added | Faisal | Depends on how you set things up. E.g. let's view $H^\ast(\mathfrak g;\mathbb R)$ as being computed by the complex $(\wedge^q\mathfrak g^\ast,d)$ (I'll omit the formula for $d$...). Then the second equality is trivial: $f\in\mathfrak g^\ast$ is in $H^1$ iff $df=0$ (there are no 1-coboundaries). The formula for $d$ here is $df(X,Y)=f([X,Y])$, whence $f\in H^1 \iff f\in (\mathfrak g/[\mathfrak g,\mathfrak g])^\ast$. | |
May 1, 2012 at 23:34 | comment | added | Igor Rivin | How easy are the first two equalities? | |
May 1, 2012 at 15:18 | comment | added | Faisal | By the way, this argument is most likely due to Chevalley--Eilenberg. I would give a more precise reference but my erratic internet connection is making this difficult. | |
May 1, 2012 at 14:51 | history | answered | Faisal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |