Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

broken link fixed, cf. https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/a/34713/228959
Source Link
Glorfindel
Glorfindel
  • 2.8k
  • 6
  • 28
  • 38

Sounds like a distribution except that instead of having linear subspaces you have cones. There's this paper: Langerock, "Conic Distributions and Accessible Sets,"Langerock, "Conic Distributions and Accessible Sets," but it sounds an awful lot like your question (and I wonder if that's where you're starting from in the first place!). It also doesn't say anything about the computability of the accessible set, though they do provide some characterization.

Sounds like a distribution except that instead of having linear subspaces you have cones. There's this paper: Langerock, "Conic Distributions and Accessible Sets," but it sounds an awful lot like your question (and I wonder if that's where you're starting from in the first place!). It also doesn't say anything about the computability of the accessible set, though they do provide some characterization.

Sounds like a distribution except that instead of having linear subspaces you have cones. There's this paper: Langerock, "Conic Distributions and Accessible Sets," but it sounds an awful lot like your question (and I wonder if that's where you're starting from in the first place!). It also doesn't say anything about the computability of the accessible set, though they do provide some characterization.

Source Link
TerronaBell
TerronaBell
  • 3.1k
  • 26
  • 29

Sounds like a distribution except that instead of having linear subspaces you have cones. There's this paper: Langerock, "Conic Distributions and Accessible Sets," but it sounds an awful lot like your question (and I wonder if that's where you're starting from in the first place!). It also doesn't say anything about the computability of the accessible set, though they do provide some characterization.