Skip to main content
25 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 27, 2021 at 20:29 comment added Clive Long $h$ serves the same purpose as $\delta x$. But further, $h$ represents the height of the trapezium that "stands on" the x-axis "above" h. The sum of the area of the trapezia (between limits) approximates the area between the upper and lower limits of the integral and "in the limit" (hand-waving) is the value of the area / definite integral. I have no historic reference to back this up, and this explanation as to why $h$ was used may be "after-the-fact" to justify the use of $h$ - but I like it - and now I have shared with you.
Dec 27, 2021 at 20:29 comment added Clive Long For this very old question, we were taught (in UK) in our introductory calculus class on differentiation from first principles (of a single-variable function, x). $\Delta x$ represents any change in the value of the variable x. $\delta x$ represents any "small" change in the value of the variable x that is decreased in size and approaches zero "in the limit" (cue hand-waving here).
May 2, 2012 at 14:59 history edited Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
May 2, 2012 at 0:19 history edited Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 characters in body
Apr 30, 2012 at 16:46 history edited Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 75 characters in body
Apr 30, 2012 at 14:25 history edited Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 54 characters in body; added 20 characters in body
Apr 30, 2012 at 13:59 history edited Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 501 characters in body
Apr 30, 2012 at 10:42 history edited Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 40 characters in body; deleted 38 characters in body
Apr 30, 2012 at 10:29 history edited Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 11 characters in body
Apr 29, 2012 at 12:11 history edited Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 characters in body; deleted 2 characters in body
Apr 29, 2012 at 11:01 history edited Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
Apr 29, 2012 at 3:17 comment added I. J. Kennedy The places where Boyle is mentioned in the answer, is it supposed to by Boole?
Apr 29, 2012 at 2:17 history edited Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 279 characters in body
Apr 28, 2012 at 11:42 comment added Papiro @Jeff: Taylor's work about increments is available at 17centurymaths.com/contents/taylorscontents.html. Also, there is a work from L. Feigenbaum, (tufts.edu/as/math/feigenbaum.html) published by Springer (springerlink.com/content/h720142152632171) but I have no access to it.
Apr 27, 2012 at 15:26 comment added Jeff McGowan Interesting, and thanks so much. One thing I would love to see is the original reference of Taylor which Sloman refers to...
Apr 27, 2012 at 15:25 vote accept Jeff McGowan
Apr 27, 2012 at 14:23 comment added Papiro Laplace writes: "Nous désignerons ordinairements les variables des fonctions par les dernières letters de l'alphabet, x, y, etc., et las constantes par les premières a, b, c, etc..."
Apr 27, 2012 at 14:15 comment added Papiro @Michael I think you are correct. Please, see ref. of Lacroix's book, first paragraph, pp. 599: "... corresponding to the increment h ...".
Apr 27, 2012 at 14:08 history edited Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 420 characters in body
Apr 27, 2012 at 13:59 comment added Michael Renardy It would seem reasonable to speculate that i stands for increment. It may have been changed to h later to avoid conflicts of notation.
Apr 27, 2012 at 13:41 history edited Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 702 characters in body
Apr 27, 2012 at 11:54 history edited Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 143 characters in body; added 100 characters in body
Apr 27, 2012 at 10:26 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by Papiro
Apr 26, 2012 at 19:37 history edited Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 81 characters in body
Apr 26, 2012 at 19:32 history answered Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0