Timeline for Mapping Class Groups of Punctured Surfaces (and maybe Billiards)
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 30, 2009 at 0:39 | vote | accept | john mangual | ||
Dec 24, 2009 at 19:28 | answer | added | Dmitri Panov | timeline score: 4 | |
Dec 22, 2009 at 22:19 | comment | added | john mangual | OK, so when we talk about mapping class groups, there's usually an action going on. In my case, that's probably the action on the orbits of the billiard flow or on the moduli space of translation surfaces itself. Let me think about this a bit more... | |
Dec 22, 2009 at 21:15 | answer | added | JSE | timeline score: 5 | |
Dec 22, 2009 at 12:36 | history | edited | Sam Nead |
edited tags
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 at 3:13 | comment | added | Ryan Budney | If your standard for concrete is $SL(2, \mathbb Z)$ you might not like the kinds of answers you get for other mapping class groups. :) Usually people come to understand mapping class groups by their actions on things -- Teichmuller space, the space of curves in the surface (curve complexes), etc. If all you care about is elements of the mapping class group up to conjugacy, a nice way to study them is by the surface bundles over a circle you can form using the mapping as monodromy. | |
Dec 22, 2009 at 3:07 | answer | added | Andy Putman | timeline score: 25 | |
Dec 22, 2009 at 1:58 | history | asked | john mangual | CC BY-SA 2.5 |