Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Nov 22, 2014 at 16:05 history suggested Riccardo CC BY-SA 3.0
corrected last composition, clearly a typo of the writer
Nov 22, 2014 at 15:45 review Suggested edits
S Nov 22, 2014 at 16:05
May 3, 2012 at 9:56 vote accept Victor
May 3, 2012 at 9:56 vote accept Victor
May 3, 2012 at 9:56
May 3, 2012 at 2:20 history edited Victor CC BY-SA 3.0
Typo in a key formula
Apr 27, 2012 at 11:06 vote accept Victor
May 3, 2012 at 9:56
Apr 27, 2012 at 10:59 comment added Victor Tom, thinking more about your example I was trying to produce one for which the union $AUB$ is not simply connected. Consider the Hawaiian earring $H$ lying on the $xy$-plane in $\mathbb{R}^3$ in the usual way. Let $A$ be the cone over $H$, with vertex at $(0,0,1)$. Now, rotate $H$ $180$ degrees about the $z$-axis and let $B$ be the cone over this new space, with vertex at $(0,0,-1)$. Both $A$ and $B$ are contractible and have a single point in common. But the fundamental group of the union has at least countably many generators.
Apr 26, 2012 at 17:38 vote accept Victor
Apr 27, 2012 at 11:06
Apr 26, 2012 at 17:27 comment added Victor Tom, nice example. Thank you! The pair $(B,(0,0))$ does not have the HEP. It was harder for me to find examples of pairs $(X,C)$ not having the HEP, with $C$ closed. Hatcher gives only one such example in his book (p. 14). Here is another: let $X$ equal the closed subspace of $\mathbf{R}^{2}$ consisting of the graph of $y=sin(1/x)$ for $x\in(0,1]$, the segment $C=0\times[−1,1]$, and an arc connecting $(1,sin(1))$ to the origin. (Exercise 1.3.7 in Hatcher's has a picture of this space). The pair $(X,C)$ does not have the HEP.
Apr 26, 2012 at 16:21 comment added Ronnie Brown I mention that I came across the gluing theorem in about 1966 by first generalising the result that a homotopy equivalence of spaces induces an isomorphism of homotopy groups. The generalisation replaces the pair $(S^n,x)$ by a pair $(X,A)$ satisfying the HEP. (Section 7.2 of "Topology and groupoids".) I like to have the general result available.
Apr 26, 2012 at 14:47 history edited Victor CC BY-SA 3.0
Corrected bad notation
Apr 26, 2012 at 1:33 comment added Tom Goodwillie For example, in the plane let $A$ consist of the points $(-1/n,0)$ ($n\ge 1$) and $(0,0)$ together with line segments from these points to $(0,-1)$, and let $B$ consist of the points $(1/n,0)$ and $(0,0)$ together with line segments from these points to $(0,1)$. Then $A$ and $B$ are contractible, their intersection is a point, but $A\cup B$ is not contractible.
Apr 26, 2012 at 1:21 history edited Victor CC BY-SA 3.0
Correction of mistake
Apr 25, 2012 at 16:32 comment added Tom Goodwillie In your example $Z\cup_{\phi\circ f}X$ is a (non-Hausdorff) space with two points, but it is of course true that it's not homotopy equivalent to a circle. There are also counterexamples in which everything is compact and Hausdorff.
Apr 25, 2012 at 8:52 history answered Victor CC BY-SA 3.0