Timeline for Pleated surfaces do not curl up too much
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 15, 2012 at 16:27 | vote | accept | Damiano Lupi | ||
Apr 15, 2012 at 8:58 | comment | added | Sam Nead | I swapped $A$ and $B$ in your question to match the usage in Minsky. That is, $A$ is a bound in $(S, \rho)$ while $B$ is a bound in $N$. (This means that $B$ should be replaced by $A$ in Misha's comment. Sorry Misha!) | |
Apr 15, 2012 at 8:55 | history | edited | Sam Nead | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Swapped order of A, B to match Minsky
|
Apr 15, 2012 at 8:44 | answer | added | Sam Nead | timeline score: 1 | |
Apr 14, 2012 at 23:20 | comment | added | Misha | Are you assuming a lower bound $\epsilon$ on injectivity radius of $N$? If you do then diameter of $g(S)$ is bounded above by some function $B$ of genus of the surface and $\epsilon$. Then you take your $B$ to be the function above. | |
Apr 14, 2012 at 15:25 | comment | added | Dylan Thurston | I fixed a typo in your transcription of Minsky's lemma (an inequality went the wrong way). | |
Apr 14, 2012 at 15:23 | history | edited | Dylan Thurston | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed a typo in lemma statement
|
Apr 14, 2012 at 14:50 | history | asked | Damiano Lupi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |