Timeline for Why the underlying function of a monomorphism may not be an injection
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2014 at 7:11 | comment | added | goblin GONE | In regards to point (1), we do not choose a faithful functor to set, rather $\mathcal{C}$ is equipped with such a functor. | |
| Apr 10, 2012 at 17:16 | comment | added | Jack Huizenga | I agree. I have posed this as a separate question. | |
| Apr 10, 2012 at 11:33 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek | Point (2) begs the question whether every concrete category can be concretized in such a way that all monomorphisms are injective? | |
| Apr 9, 2012 at 23:56 | vote | accept | Zuriel | ||
| Apr 9, 2012 at 21:32 | history | answered | Jack Huizenga | CC BY-SA 3.0 |