Timeline for effective/constructive/algorithmic probability theory
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 16, 2013 at 10:03 | comment | added | Bas Spitters | Is your question related to this one? mathoverflow.net/questions/141764/… | |
May 2, 2012 at 12:51 | history | edited | Ed Dean |
edited tags
|
|
May 2, 2012 at 12:51 | comment | added | Ed Dean | @James: I took the liberty of adding the lo.logic tag as Jason suggested, since that might get you some feedback beyond my somewhat deflationary answer. | |
Apr 10, 2012 at 18:56 | comment | added | Jason Rute | I forgot to add proof mining to the above list. It is an application of proof theory which can be used to extract numerical bounded from (apparently) noneffective proofs. | |
Apr 10, 2012 at 18:53 | comment | added | Jason Rute | There are a lot of similar efforts in this regard: algorithmic randomness, computable analysis, constructive math, and reverse mathematics. As Ed Dean pointed out, the theory of computation for analytic objects is fairly well-understood. What is left is to work out the details for each theorem. For example, if a theorem asserts the existence of an object, when is it computable? Is there a specific application/theorem you had in mind? (I work in these fields and I am very interested in what the computational concerns are of analysts, probabilists, and ergodic-theorists.) | |
Apr 10, 2012 at 18:22 | comment | added | Jason Rute | It might be helpful to add a lo.logic tag, since I think this is where much of this work is being done in. | |
Apr 3, 2012 at 5:10 | answer | added | Ed Dean | timeline score: 4 | |
Apr 3, 2012 at 3:32 | history | edited | Ori Gurel-Gurevich |
retag
|
|
Apr 3, 2012 at 2:11 | history | asked | James Propp | CC BY-SA 3.0 |