Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Jun 9, 2014 at 19:16 history suggested evgeny CC BY-SA 3.0
COdimension: the lowest term should be of X, and the greatest - degree - of its section by codimension=n subspace; other edits to allow such a tiny edit
Jun 9, 2014 at 19:14 review Suggested edits
S Jun 9, 2014 at 19:16
Dec 10, 2013 at 15:35 history edited Charles Staats CC BY-SA 3.0
added 118 characters in body
Mar 30, 2013 at 18:03 history edited Charles Staats CC BY-SA 3.0
added 419 characters in body
Mar 29, 2013 at 19:09 answer added anonymous timeline score: 8
May 2, 2012 at 19:06 vote accept Charles Staats
Apr 1, 2012 at 14:29 comment added Charles Staats Another comment: I'm asking for a geometric characterization, not simply a geometric property or a method of computation in some cases (although these are, of course, good to know). For instance, I consider the last bullet point a very nice geometric characterization for the genus of a real closed 2-manifold, as opposed to e.g. a characterization in terms of Betti numbers, but I imagine that this is rarely, if ever, a good definition for computing the genus.
Apr 1, 2012 at 12:25 comment added Charles Staats I consider that the (arithmetic) genus of $X$ already has at least two geometric characterizations when $X$ is a curve. I'm primarily interested in characterizations that work when $X$ is not a curve.
Apr 1, 2012 at 12:11 answer added Georges Elencwajg timeline score: 35
Apr 1, 2012 at 10:52 comment added Ariyan Javanpeykar Just a comment which probably won't help you much, but if you have a curve and you are able to "compute" a finite morphism to $\mathbf{P}^1$, then you can determine the genus. "Computing" a finite morphism means determining its degree and ramification type. This is possible in some cases (for example modular curves) and gives you a (geometric?) characterization of the genus.
Mar 31, 2012 at 20:21 history asked Charles Staats CC BY-SA 3.0