Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 18, 2022 at 18:44 comment added Carl-Fredrik Nyberg Brodda @Woett This is 10 years later, but you wrote "Uchida" in your answer rather than "Uchiyama". "Da" (or rather, "Ta" 田) is Japanese for "rice field", whereas "Yama" (山) is Japanese for "mountain"!
S Oct 12, 2017 at 16:26 history suggested jeq CC BY-SA 3.0
Fixed broken link (in an already-bumped question). Added citation.
Oct 12, 2017 at 14:38 review Suggested edits
S Oct 12, 2017 at 16:26
Apr 1, 2012 at 20:59 comment added Mark Lewko @Woett, its just the translation of the names.
Apr 1, 2012 at 0:04 comment added Woett @Scott Could you please elaborate? It sounds like a good joke. I just don't get it :p
Apr 1, 2012 at 0:04 comment added Woett @Mark Yeah, sorry for this anticlimactic ending. Thanks for accepting my answer though. My first one! Yay!
Mar 31, 2012 at 3:29 comment added Terry Tao The order of quantifiers in Erdos's statement seems clear enough; since it refers to "une progression" rather than "la progression", it asks for uniformity over progressions.
Mar 31, 2012 at 3:06 vote accept Mark Lewko
Mar 31, 2012 at 3:05 comment added Mark Lewko Just to recap: I was aware that both Rudin's and Erdos' problems required uniformity in $a$ and $b$. My question was basically "I don't understand how Uchiyama's argument gives uniformity in $a$." The answer turns out to be: "it doesn't." The statement (in french) of Erdos' problem can be found in bolyai.math-inst.hu/~p_erdos/1963-14.pdf (problem 16). It seems to not be completely clear on the uniformity issue (although its hard to imagine that it never occurred to the author or referee that Erdos was asking for a uniform estimate).
Mar 31, 2012 at 2:46 comment added S. Carnahan The difference between Uchiyama and Uchida is a mountain versus a rice field.
Mar 30, 2012 at 21:12 history edited Woett CC BY-SA 3.0
added 224 characters in body
Mar 30, 2012 at 21:06 history answered Woett CC BY-SA 3.0