Timeline for Generalizations/applications of a formula for the Dedekind zeta function?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Apr 12, 2012 at 9:44 | comment | added | Guillermo Mantilla | @Alex: This is really a great answer! | |
| Mar 30, 2012 at 13:56 | comment | added | Alex B. | Thank you, Frank, for the kind words! Actually, you are quite right: the proof of the conductor-discriminant formula is the same so-called Artin formalism. | |
| Mar 30, 2012 at 13:42 | comment | added | Frank Thorne | One question about your "final remark": My impression of the proofs is that the proof of the relations among Artin $L$-functions is quite similar to that of the conductor-discriminant formula (at least, the proofs given in Neukirch). Although the c-d formula can be proved without Artin $L$-functions, these $L$-function relations seem to be the biggest, most useful hammer in the toolbox. However I am not an expert in the subject (and evidently you are!) If you think my perspective is at all misleading, would you please explain? Thank you very much! | |
| Mar 30, 2012 at 13:35 | vote | accept | Frank Thorne | ||
| Mar 30, 2012 at 5:23 | history | edited | Alex B. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 186 characters in body; added 64 characters in body
|
| Mar 30, 2012 at 5:17 | history | answered | Alex B. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |