Timeline for To which extent can one recover a manifold from its group of homeomorphisms
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2012 at 6:55 | comment | added | Andrew Stacey | Misha: If you do the reference chase then the results that Igor and Martin quote use this result so this one is the original that sparked all of the others. I thought that worth mentioning. Vitali: I hadn't picked up on that point. However, when I posted then this question already had an accepted answer so I wasn't trying to provide an answer as such, rather I just thought this might be a useful addition to what was already there. | |
| Mar 28, 2012 at 17:43 | comment | added | Misha | Results that Igor and Martin quote give complete answer in the smooth case. | |
| Mar 28, 2012 at 15:13 | comment | added | Vitali Kapovitch | that's a much easier question though. The original question doesn't assume that the isomorphism between the diffeomorphism groups comes from a bijection of the underlying manifolds. | |
| Mar 28, 2012 at 11:22 | history | answered | Andrew Stacey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |