Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 29, 2022 at 2:02 comment added David Roberts The link in Ryan's comment is broken, here's a replacement: arxiv.org/abs/math/0401075.
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Feb 5, 2014 at 3:56 history edited Ricardo Andrade CC BY-SA 3.0
replaced deprecated tag 'topology'; added tag; replaced expression 'homotopic'
Mar 29, 2012 at 11:27 vote accept alvarezpaiva
Mar 29, 2012 at 8:28 answer added Paolo Salvatore timeline score: 16
Mar 28, 2012 at 15:39 comment added Mark Grant @Ben: I believe the case of simply-connected and two points is also still open.
Mar 28, 2012 at 8:34 comment added alvarezpaiva @Misha: Yes, this solves the first problem. This was the gist of Goodwillie's answer to zygund's question. I'm just a bit curious as to Wu Wen-Tsün's observation and would like to know how much topological, but non-homotopical, information can be encoded in configuration spaces. By the remarks of Ryan and Ben it seems quite a bit is known about this question.
Mar 28, 2012 at 0:52 comment added Ryan Budney @Ben, right, but simply-connected 4-manifolds are still below the (known) threshold for the homotopy-type of configuration spaces to be a homotopy-invariant of the input manifold.
Mar 28, 2012 at 0:14 answer added Ryan Budney timeline score: 3
Mar 27, 2012 at 22:53 comment added Ben Wieland I think some context is needed for the Salvatore-Longoni paper. For compact manifolds, the homotopy type of configuration spaces are homotopy invariants if the manifolds are highly connected and the number of points is small (open: just simply connected + many points), but S&L give a counterexample when the compact manifolds have fundamental group.
Mar 27, 2012 at 21:15 comment added Misha Look at the intersection pairing on $H_2$ of the total space. From this you can read off the Euler number and, hence, the Chern class.
Mar 27, 2012 at 20:15 comment added Ryan Budney Have you read the Salvatore-Longoni paper? front.math.ucdavis.edu/0401.5075 It's very close in spirit with your line of inquiry.
Mar 27, 2012 at 19:58 history edited alvarezpaiva CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 4 characters in body
Mar 27, 2012 at 19:49 history asked alvarezpaiva CC BY-SA 3.0