Timeline for Hopf structure of Uq(sl(2))
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2012 at 1:02 | vote | accept | Ryan | ||
| Mar 28, 2012 at 2:07 | comment | added | David Jordan | I'd note, in addition to the descriptions below of how to land at those precise relations, that E and F in U_q(sl_2) are skew-primitive elements, relative to the group like elements K and 1. See www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/tenscat1.pdf, section 1.27, for an explanation of the deeper meaning of skew primitive elements. | |
| Mar 28, 2012 at 2:00 | comment | added | Ryan | You're right. Peter McNamara did give something of a motivation, but I am looking for something a bit more "basic" at this point. | |
| Mar 27, 2012 at 23:31 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Peter McNamara's post did give something like a motivation for the coalgebra structure, although it never hurts to have another... | |
| Mar 27, 2012 at 23:09 | answer | added | David Jordan | timeline score: 7 | |
| Mar 27, 2012 at 13:53 | answer | added | Nicola Ciccoli | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 27, 2012 at 2:08 | comment | added | Ryan | No, that was concerning the generating relations for $U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}(2))$. | |
| Mar 27, 2012 at 0:31 | answer | added | Adrien | timeline score: 6 | |
| Mar 26, 2012 at 23:40 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | This was motivated combinatorially in an answer to a question you asked recently, no? | |
| Mar 26, 2012 at 23:25 | history | asked | Ryan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |