Timeline for Intrinsic characterization of Soergel bimodules?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2012 at 3:41 | vote | accept | Dylan Thurston | ||
| Jun 18, 2012 at 8:20 | answer | added | Geordie Williamson | timeline score: 12 | |
| Mar 26, 2012 at 23:46 | history | edited | Dylan Thurston | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 148 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2012 at 23:44 | vote | accept | Dylan Thurston | ||
| Jun 26, 2012 at 3:41 | |||||
| Mar 26, 2012 at 22:10 | answer | added | Ben Webster♦ | timeline score: 6 | |
| Mar 26, 2012 at 14:15 | history | edited | Dylan Thurston | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 326 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2012 at 14:10 | comment | added | Dylan Thurston | Sorry about the numbering; fixed now. I'm afraid I don't know background references; I only just started looking at Soergel bimodules. I learned about them from Khovanov's paper "Triply graded link homology and Hochschild homology of Soergel bimodules", but surely there are better references. | |
| Mar 26, 2012 at 14:04 | history | edited | Dylan Thurston | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Mar 26, 2012 at 13:39 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys |
It's a challenging question. Meanwhile it's a good idea to label the third condition 3 rather than 1 for clarity, and maybe add one or two background references. My impression is that $S_n$ behaves better than other Weyl groups and their coinvariant algebras in Soergel's set-up, so I wonder if there is any hope for a general characterization along the lines you propose for this special case?
|
|
| Mar 26, 2012 at 12:59 | history | edited | Dylan Thurston |
added tags
|
|
| Mar 26, 2012 at 4:25 | history | edited | Dylan Thurston | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 50 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2012 at 2:34 | history | asked | Dylan Thurston | CC BY-SA 3.0 |