Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 8, 2012 at 19:43 comment added Jim Humphreys @Baptiste: I'm undecided about the relative value of the "modern" accounts mentioned, but should have mentioned an opinion from the source X that the SGA3 treatment is too abstract and general to be a first choice here. At any rate, there do exist some accounts not reliant on Weil's older language.
Apr 8, 2012 at 10:03 comment added Baptiste Calmès @Jim What's wrong with the reference in SGA3 given in the comment by anon above? Doesn't it fulfill the goal of explaining Weil's theorem in modern language? Surely, if someone can read Neron Models, he or she can read SGA3 too, right? May I also point out that there is a set of notes by Bas Edixhoven, Ariane Mézard and Matthieu Romagny from a recent summer school at Luminy about SGA3, exactly on the topic of Weil's theorem. These notes can be found here: math.ens.fr/~gille/sem/notes434.html
Mar 25, 2012 at 22:38 vote accept spohreis
Mar 25, 2012 at 22:11 history edited Jim Humphreys CC BY-SA 3.0
added 708 characters in body; edited body
Mar 25, 2012 at 19:48 history edited Jim Humphreys CC BY-SA 3.0
added 173 characters in body
Mar 25, 2012 at 19:39 history answered Jim Humphreys CC BY-SA 3.0