Skip to main content

Timeline for Two versions of "absolutely ccc"

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 9, 2013 at 21:34 answer added Monroe Eskew timeline score: 6
Jun 8, 2013 at 6:45 comment added Monroe Eskew How do you prove that the Knaster property is indestructible?
Mar 24, 2012 at 23:08 comment added saf Thanks, Arthur. I stand corrected! (indeed, if there is a non-Knaster ($ccc$) poset, then there is one of size $\aleph_1$.) The fact I had in mind is that any $ccc$ poset of size $<\mathfrak{m}$ is $\sigma$- centered.
Mar 24, 2012 at 8:01 comment added user642796 @saf: See e.g., Jech (3rd ed.), Theorem 16.21, p.277. The proof actually gives the slightly stronger result that MA$_{\aleph_1} $implies that all ccc posets have precalibre $\aleph_1$.
Mar 24, 2012 at 0:59 comment added saf Be careful! Martin's Axiom implies that any $ccc$ poset of size less than the continuum is Knaster.
Mar 23, 2012 at 18:23 answer added Goldstern timeline score: 1
Mar 23, 2012 at 17:32 comment added Joel David Hamkins One also sometimes sees a weaker notion, asserting only that $\cal P$ remains ccc after forcing with $\cal P$ itself. This is equivalent to saying that ${\cal P}\times{\cal P}$ is ccc.
Mar 23, 2012 at 17:04 history asked user642796 CC BY-SA 3.0