Timeline for Two versions of "absolutely ccc"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 9, 2013 at 21:34 | answer | added | Monroe Eskew | timeline score: 6 | |
Jun 8, 2013 at 6:45 | comment | added | Monroe Eskew | How do you prove that the Knaster property is indestructible? | |
Mar 24, 2012 at 23:08 | comment | added | saf | Thanks, Arthur. I stand corrected! (indeed, if there is a non-Knaster ($ccc$) poset, then there is one of size $\aleph_1$.) The fact I had in mind is that any $ccc$ poset of size $<\mathfrak{m}$ is $\sigma$- centered. | |
Mar 24, 2012 at 8:01 | comment | added | user642796 | @saf: See e.g., Jech (3rd ed.), Theorem 16.21, p.277. The proof actually gives the slightly stronger result that MA$_{\aleph_1} $implies that all ccc posets have precalibre $\aleph_1$. | |
Mar 24, 2012 at 0:59 | comment | added | saf | Be careful! Martin's Axiom implies that any $ccc$ poset of size less than the continuum is Knaster. | |
Mar 23, 2012 at 18:23 | answer | added | Goldstern | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 23, 2012 at 17:32 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | One also sometimes sees a weaker notion, asserting only that $\cal P$ remains ccc after forcing with $\cal P$ itself. This is equivalent to saying that ${\cal P}\times{\cal P}$ is ccc. | |
Mar 23, 2012 at 17:04 | history | asked | user642796 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |