Timeline for Can the set of iso classes of G-equivariant H-bundles be given by ordinary homotopy classes of non-equivariant maps?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2012 at 1:54 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | I don't think I'm going to get any other answers after this... :) | |
| Mar 26, 2012 at 1:53 | vote | accept | David Roberts♦ | ||
| Mar 23, 2012 at 3:42 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | It's not what I was going to use. incidentally, my group G is homotopic to an abelian group, does that help? | |
| Mar 23, 2012 at 3:18 | comment | added | Peter May | Better you should get higher category theory off your brain: it only distracts here. Just look at representations versus bundles. | |
| Mar 23, 2012 at 3:15 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Clearly here only taking simplicial spaces which are the nerves of groupoids. | |
| Mar 23, 2012 at 3:14 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Hmm, ok. I was also thinking that there might be a conceptual explanation for why it might (or might not!) hold, coming from all this new-fangled higher category theory. Namely, can we compute hom-spaces between simplicial spaces (properly) by considering their geometric realisations. | |
| Mar 23, 2012 at 3:07 | history | answered | Peter May | CC BY-SA 3.0 |