Skip to main content
added 13 characters in body
Source Link
Marc Palm
  • 11.2k
  • 2
  • 35
  • 92

You can take the profinite completion $\widehat{\mathbb{Z}} = \prod_p \mathbb{Z}_p$ of $\mathbb{Z}$, then open subgroups of $G( \widehat{\mathbb{Z}})$ correspond to congruence subgroups in $G(\mathbb{Z})$.

The identification is easy:

$$ \Gamma \; congruence \leftrightarrow K \; open$$

"$\rightarrow$": Assume you have a congruence subgroup $\Gamma \subset \Gamma(N)$, then we can consider $$ \Gamma / \Gamma(N) \subset SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / N) = \bigoplus_{p^k || N} SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / p^k ).$$$$ \Gamma / \Gamma(N) \subset SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / N) = \prod\limits_{p^k || N} SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / p^k ).$$ Define $K = K(\Gamma)$ as the pullback of $\Gamma / \Gamma(N)$ along the surjection $$p: \bigoplus_{p} SL_2(\mathbb{Z}_p) \rightarrow \bigoplus_{p^k || N} SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / p^k )$$$$p: \prod\limits_{p} SL_2(\mathbb{Z}_p) \rightarrow \prod\limits_{p^k || N} SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / p^k )$$

"$\leftarrow$": Pick $\Gamma = K \cap SL_2(\mathbb{Q})$, where $SL_2( \mathbb{Q})$ is diagonal subgroup $\prod\limits_p SL_2(\mathbb{Q}_{p})$.

You can take the profinite completion $\widehat{\mathbb{Z}} = \prod_p \mathbb{Z}_p$ of $\mathbb{Z}$, then open subgroups of $G( \widehat{\mathbb{Z}})$ correspond to congruence subgroups in $G(\mathbb{Z})$.

The identification is easy:

$$ \Gamma \; congruence \leftrightarrow K \; open$$

$\rightarrow$: Assume you have a congruence subgroup $\Gamma \subset \Gamma(N)$, then we can consider $$ \Gamma / \Gamma(N) \subset SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / N) = \bigoplus_{p^k || N} SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / p^k ).$$ Define $K = K(\Gamma)$ as the pullback of $\Gamma / \Gamma(N)$ along the surjection $$p: \bigoplus_{p} SL_2(\mathbb{Z}_p) \rightarrow \bigoplus_{p^k || N} SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / p^k )$$

$\leftarrow$: Pick $\Gamma = K \cap SL_2(\mathbb{Q})$, where $SL_2( \mathbb{Q})$ is diagonal subgroup $\prod\limits_p SL_2(\mathbb{Q}_{p})$.

You can take the profinite completion $\widehat{\mathbb{Z}} = \prod_p \mathbb{Z}_p$ of $\mathbb{Z}$, then open subgroups of $G( \widehat{\mathbb{Z}})$ correspond to congruence subgroups in $G(\mathbb{Z})$.

The identification is easy:

$$ \Gamma \; congruence \leftrightarrow K \; open$$

"$\rightarrow$": Assume you have a congruence subgroup $\Gamma \subset \Gamma(N)$, then we can consider $$ \Gamma / \Gamma(N) \subset SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / N) = \prod\limits_{p^k || N} SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / p^k ).$$ Define $K = K(\Gamma)$ as the pullback of $\Gamma / \Gamma(N)$ along the surjection $$p: \prod\limits_{p} SL_2(\mathbb{Z}_p) \rightarrow \prod\limits_{p^k || N} SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / p^k )$$

"$\leftarrow$": Pick $\Gamma = K \cap SL_2(\mathbb{Q})$, where $SL_2( \mathbb{Q})$ is diagonal subgroup $\prod\limits_p SL_2(\mathbb{Q}_{p})$.

added 434 characters in body
Source Link
Marc Palm
  • 11.2k
  • 2
  • 35
  • 92

You can take the profinite completion $\widehat{\mathbb{Z}} = \prod_p \mathbb{Z}_p$ of $\mathbb{Z}$, then open subgroups of $G( \widehat{\mathbb{Z}})$ correspond to congruence subgroups in $G(\mathbb{Z})$.

ThisThe identification is completely standard, wheneasy:

$$ \Gamma \; congruence \leftrightarrow K \; open$$

$\rightarrow$: Assume you want to translate classical automorphic stuff to adelic automorphic stuffhave a congruence subgroup $\Gamma \subset \Gamma(N)$, and you are right that this makes everything computational more pleasantthen we can consider $$ \Gamma / \Gamma(N) \subset SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / N) = \bigoplus_{p^k || N} SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / p^k ).$$ Define $K = K(\Gamma)$ as the pullback of $\Gamma / \Gamma(N)$ along the surjection $$p: \bigoplus_{p} SL_2(\mathbb{Z}_p) \rightarrow \bigoplus_{p^k || N} SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / p^k )$$

$\leftarrow$: Pick $\Gamma = K \cap SL_2(\mathbb{Q})$, where $SL_2( \mathbb{Q})$ is diagonal subgroup $\prod\limits_p SL_2(\mathbb{Q}_{p})$.

You can take the profinite completion $\widehat{\mathbb{Z}} = \prod_p \mathbb{Z}_p$ of $\mathbb{Z}$, then open subgroups of $G( \widehat{\mathbb{Z}})$ correspond to congruence subgroups in $G(\mathbb{Z})$.

This is completely standard, when you want to translate classical automorphic stuff to adelic automorphic stuff, and you are right that this makes everything computational more pleasant.

You can take the profinite completion $\widehat{\mathbb{Z}} = \prod_p \mathbb{Z}_p$ of $\mathbb{Z}$, then open subgroups of $G( \widehat{\mathbb{Z}})$ correspond to congruence subgroups in $G(\mathbb{Z})$.

The identification is easy:

$$ \Gamma \; congruence \leftrightarrow K \; open$$

$\rightarrow$: Assume you have a congruence subgroup $\Gamma \subset \Gamma(N)$, then we can consider $$ \Gamma / \Gamma(N) \subset SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / N) = \bigoplus_{p^k || N} SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / p^k ).$$ Define $K = K(\Gamma)$ as the pullback of $\Gamma / \Gamma(N)$ along the surjection $$p: \bigoplus_{p} SL_2(\mathbb{Z}_p) \rightarrow \bigoplus_{p^k || N} SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / p^k )$$

$\leftarrow$: Pick $\Gamma = K \cap SL_2(\mathbb{Q})$, where $SL_2( \mathbb{Q})$ is diagonal subgroup $\prod\limits_p SL_2(\mathbb{Q}_{p})$.

Source Link
Marc Palm
  • 11.2k
  • 2
  • 35
  • 92

You can take the profinite completion $\widehat{\mathbb{Z}} = \prod_p \mathbb{Z}_p$ of $\mathbb{Z}$, then open subgroups of $G( \widehat{\mathbb{Z}})$ correspond to congruence subgroups in $G(\mathbb{Z})$.

This is completely standard, when you want to translate classical automorphic stuff to adelic automorphic stuff, and you are right that this makes everything computational more pleasant.