Timeline for Derived Functors Versus Spectral Sequences
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2012 at 12:56 | vote | accept | Steven Landsburg | ||
| Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | Grothendieck's spectral sequence is just a chain rule. On the one hand you have the derivatives of the composition, on the other hand you have a 'formula' (the spectral sequence) in terms of the composition of the derivatives. | |
| Mar 21, 2012 at 8:58 | history | edited | Martin Brandenburg |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 21, 2012 at 6:41 | answer | added | Sándor Kovács | timeline score: 87 | |
| Mar 21, 2012 at 2:51 | history | edited | Steven Landsburg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added second question
|
| Mar 21, 2012 at 2:50 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | One thing which becomes painful in terms of spectral sequences is what happens when you compose three functors. On the other hand, when you want to actually compute something, spectral sequences are your only friend, mostly. | |
| Mar 21, 2012 at 2:37 | history | asked | Steven Landsburg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |