Timeline for Disjoint stable sets in tournaments
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2013 at 16:05 | vote | accept | Felix Brandt | ||
| Sep 23, 2011 at 10:43 | answer | added | Felix Brandt | timeline score: 8 | |
| Dec 18, 2009 at 9:58 | history | edited | Felix Brandt | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
improved formatting
|
| Dec 17, 2009 at 20:04 | comment | added | Thomas Bloom | The statement after "i.e." is a restatement of what it means for V' to be stable. That is, it is saying that there is no v such that V' with {v} contains a transitive tournament with source v that is inclusion-maximal (since we can expand it with w). | |
| Dec 17, 2009 at 16:16 | comment | added | Harrison Brown | This looks like an interesting question, but the end of the first paragraph after "i.e." is not very easy to parse grammatically. I'm also confused about whether "for every transitive subtournament... for all x \in T" is a definition of stable set or of inclusion-maximal subtournament. Can anyone clear this up for me? | |
| Dec 17, 2009 at 15:09 | history | asked | Felix Brandt | CC BY-SA 2.5 |