Timeline for Surreal numbers vs. non-standard analysis
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2018 at 16:58 | answer | added | Vladimir Kanovei | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 29, 2018 at 4:31 | history | edited | Mike Shulman |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| May 3, 2016 at 9:04 | comment | added | Mikhail Katz | @GeraldEdgar, the point is not so much that the field No is irrelevant to Robinson's framework but that the field No may be of limited relevance to analysis; see my answer. | |
| May 3, 2016 at 9:03 | answer | added | Mikhail Katz | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 21, 2016 at 17:14 | comment | added | user21349 | related: mathoverflow.net/questions/29300/whats-wrong-with-the-surreals | |
| Mar 22, 2012 at 8:08 | vote | accept | James Propp | ||
| Mar 19, 2012 at 19:49 | comment | added | Gerald Edgar | Conway, ONAG end of Chapter 4, says "The field No is really irrelevant to nonstandard analysis." | |
| Mar 19, 2012 at 19:06 | answer | added | Philip Ehrlich | timeline score: 28 | |
| Mar 19, 2012 at 18:10 | history | asked | James Propp | CC BY-SA 3.0 |