Timeline for "Conjugacy rank" of two matrices over field extension
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 30, 2022 at 15:38 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
a rather natural generalization
|
Dec 31, 2017 at 16:42 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 86 characters in body
|
Dec 18, 2009 at 17:24 | answer | added | user709 | timeline score: 0 | |
Dec 18, 2009 at 15:29 | vote | accept | darij grinberg | ||
Dec 18, 2009 at 0:13 | answer | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | timeline score: 0 | |
Dec 17, 2009 at 17:05 | answer | added | t3suji | timeline score: 10 | |
Dec 17, 2009 at 11:08 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added an anti-hint, before someone else adds it (or wastes time trying this approach)
|
Dec 17, 2009 at 11:05 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Thanks! Though honestly I still have no idea when I have to use the grave accent and when I don't - seems perfectly random to me. But using it is a safe way, at least. | |
Dec 17, 2009 at 8:45 | comment | added | Greg Kuperberg | I fixed all of your formulas. | |
Dec 17, 2009 at 8:45 | history | edited | Greg Kuperberg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 16 characters in body; edited tags
|
Dec 17, 2009 at 8:36 | history | asked | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |