Skip to main content

Timeline for The category of posets

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
Oct 15, 2015 at 21:08 history edited John Baez CC BY-SA 3.0
fixed latex superscripts and subscripts
Sep 29, 2012 at 15:55 vote accept Gejza Jenča
May 8, 2012 at 15:41 comment added Martin Brandenburg There are lots of reasons showing up in "practice", for example when dealing with simplicial objects. Then $0 \leq 1$, you want to have a map $X_0 \to X_1$, and not vice versa. [But of course this is just notation]
May 8, 2012 at 13:17 comment added Camilo Sarmiento Sorry, this may be ordinary categorical folklore, but could you mention briefly why or whether it is more natural to view x<=y in the preorder as an arrow x->y in the category? (i.e. as opposed to the opposite direction :P )
Mar 17, 2012 at 9:22 comment added Gejza Jenča The sole purpose of this comment is to contain the word "quasiorder" (an alternative name for preorders) -- greetings to the all-seeing eye of google.
Mar 16, 2012 at 22:05 history edited Martin Brandenburg CC BY-SA 3.0
added 360 characters in body
Mar 16, 2012 at 17:41 comment added Tom Leinster @Martin: morally, I don't think you've made an error. If the OP wants to learn this stuff, one of the things they should spend time understanding is why it's OK to treat posets and preorders as essentially the same thing.
Mar 16, 2012 at 17:32 history edited Martin Brandenburg CC BY-SA 3.0
added 140 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body; added 318 characters in body
Mar 16, 2012 at 17:24 comment added Camilo Sarmiento @Martin: Could you include references to this, if any?
Mar 16, 2012 at 17:24 comment added Martin Brandenburg Though I think I've made the same error as P. May: My answer talks about preorders. Sorry about that ...
Mar 16, 2012 at 17:06 history answered Martin Brandenburg CC BY-SA 3.0