Timeline for equivalence of definitions of Carmichael numbers [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Dec 9, 2015 at 0:20 | history | closed |
Stefan Kohl♦ Ryan Budney Kim Morrison |
Not suitable for this site | |
S Dec 9, 2015 at 0:20 | comment | added | Kim Morrison | I'm closing this question as off-topic; it has been answered in the comments. | |
Dec 8, 2015 at 17:54 | review | Close votes | |||
Dec 9, 2015 at 0:20 | |||||
Dec 8, 2015 at 16:33 | answer | added | user83845 | timeline score: -2 | |
Mar 17, 2012 at 18:19 | vote | accept | laerne | ||
Mar 16, 2012 at 14:14 | answer | added | laerne | timeline score: 0 | |
Mar 15, 2012 at 14:17 | comment | added | KConrad | From the condition on the right, prove n satisfies Korselt's criterion. (Look in any book that discusses Carmichael numbers for a proof.) In particular, you can write $n=p_1...p_r$ with distinct primes $p_i$. To prove two integers are congruent mod $n$, check they're congruent modulo each $p_i$. So we want to show for every $a$ that $a^n\equiv a \bmod p_i$ for all $i$. Write this as $a(a^{n−1}−1)\equiv 0 \bmod p_i$. Since $p_i−1$ is a factor of $n−1$ (by Korselt), if gcd($a$,$p_i$)=1 then $a^{n-1}\equiv 1 \bmod p_i$,and if gcd($a$,$p_i$)>1 then $p_i|a$ so $a \equiv 0 \bmod p_i$. QED | |
Mar 15, 2012 at 14:08 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek | Do show that $n$ is square-free. | |
Mar 15, 2012 at 14:06 | history | edited | Emil Jeřábek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fix
|
Mar 15, 2012 at 13:59 | history | edited | KConrad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 151 characters in body; added 2 characters in body; added 37 characters in body
|
Mar 15, 2012 at 13:51 | history | edited | laerne |
edited tags
|
|
Mar 15, 2012 at 13:39 | history | asked | laerne | CC BY-SA 3.0 |