Skip to main content

Timeline for Field constructions

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 14, 2012 at 16:25 vote accept CommunityBot moved from User.Id=10290 by developer User.Id=35285
Mar 14, 2012 at 10:11 comment added Martin Brandenburg I think this question is quite vague.
Mar 14, 2012 at 6:39 history edited user10290 CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 186 characters in body
Mar 14, 2012 at 6:12 answer added Denis Serre timeline score: 1
Mar 14, 2012 at 1:44 answer added Andrew Stout timeline score: 5
Mar 14, 2012 at 1:21 comment added KConrad You really should read about Witt vectors, as Tom suggests. Although the construction in my previous comment leads to a (nonconstructive) field of char. 0 out of infinitely many fields of different positive characteristics, Witt vectors are a mathematically more significant way to create fields (well, domains) of characteristic 0 out of finite fields in a good (= functorial) manner.
Mar 14, 2012 at 1:19 comment added KConrad Since you allow products of fields, consider $A= \prod_{p} {\mathbf Z}/p{\mathbf Z}$. This ring has characteristic 0: for no positive integer $n$ does $n=0$ in A. Let I be the ideal of elements of A which have finitely many nonzero coordinates. By Zorn's lemma, I is contained in a maximal ideal M of A. What's the characteristic of the field A/M? If it were a prime $p$ then $p=0$ in A/M, so $p$ is in M. But as a (diagonal) sequence in A, $p$ has all but one nonzero coordinate. Use this and the fact that I is in M to show 1 is in M, which is a contradiction. So char(A/M) = 0.
Mar 14, 2012 at 0:46 history edited user10290 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 76 characters in body; added 1 characters in body
Mar 14, 2012 at 0:43 comment added Tom Goodwillie How about Witt vectors?
Mar 14, 2012 at 0:41 answer added Barry timeline score: 3
Mar 14, 2012 at 0:37 history asked user10290 CC BY-SA 3.0