Timeline for Extension of weakly compact operators from $\ell_1$ into $c_0$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 14, 2012 at 16:15 | comment | added | Joaquin M. Gutierrez | Thank you very much, Professor Johnson, for your beautiful answer. Joaquin | |
Mar 13, 2012 at 22:09 | history | edited | Yemon Choi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarification
|
Mar 13, 2012 at 22:08 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Good points, Bill. I (mis)understood the question as asking for any extension to $E$ which contains a continuous linear image of $\ell^1$. See Matt's comment above. | |
Mar 13, 2012 at 20:49 | comment | added | Bill Johnson | In his Memoirs "Extension of compact operators", on page 19 Lindenstrauss remarks that the formal identity from $\ell_2$ into $c_0$ does not have an extension to any copy of $\ell_\infty$ containing $\ell_2$ isomorphically. More generally, since $\ell_\infty$ has the Dunford-Pettis property and every bounded linear operator from $\ell_\infty$ to $c_0$ is weakly compact, there are severe restrictions on operators into $c_0$ which can be extended to a containing copy of $\ell_\infty$. | |
Mar 13, 2012 at 20:06 | comment | added | Bill Johnson |
Anyway, the identity $i_{1,2}$ from $\ell_1$ to $\ell_2$ has an extension to any space containing $\ell_1$ isomorphically, because $i_{1,2}$ is $2$-summing (and thus factors through $\ell_\infty$), hence also the identity from $\ell_1$ to $c_0$ has an extension.
|
|
Mar 13, 2012 at 19:56 | comment | added | Bill Johnson | Why would the extension give a projection, Yemon? | |
Mar 13, 2012 at 17:43 | history | answered | Yemon Choi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |