Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 18, 2012 at 12:23 vote accept Mate
Mar 18, 2012 at 9:41 answer added Vedran Krcadinac timeline score: 2
Mar 13, 2012 at 1:32 comment added Noam D. Elkies Sorry, indeed it seemed to me that you were asking whether any design that already has repeated blocks must have constant multiplicity. For your actual intended question I might have to think some more...
Mar 12, 2012 at 7:33 history edited Mate CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 characters in body
Mar 12, 2012 at 7:28 comment added Mate @Noam: I don't see how this answers my question :( I gave clarification above.
Mar 12, 2012 at 7:28 history edited Mate CC BY-SA 3.0
restatement of question; added 90 characters in body; edited body; added 84 characters in body; added 31 characters in body
Mar 12, 2012 at 7:17 history edited Mate CC BY-SA 3.0
added 50 characters in body
Mar 12, 2012 at 0:46 comment added Noam D. Elkies Simple counterexample: $(v,k,\lambda) = (5,1,2)$, $$ {\cal B} = \lbrace \lbrace1,2\rbrace, \lbrace2,3\rbrace, \lbrace3,1\rbrace, \lbrace4,5\rbrace, \lbrace4,5\rbrace \rbrace. $$
Mar 12, 2012 at 0:32 comment added Noam D. Elkies There are many counterexamples. As Cameron and van Lint explain in the beginning of their text Designs, Graphs, Codes and Their Links, if $\lambda < k < v-\lambda$ then a $(v,k,\lambda)$ design with repeated blocks is tantamount to a positive solution of a linear system with more variables than equations, and thus always exists, unlike BIBD's without repeats for which $v,k,\lambda$ must satisfy many constraints.
Mar 12, 2012 at 0:14 history edited Mate CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body; added 44 characters in body
Mar 12, 2012 at 0:08 history asked Mate CC BY-SA 3.0