Timeline for What are some examples of ingenious, unexpected constructions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
37 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2018 at 10:16 | answer | added | Mozibur Ullah | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 22, 2018 at 20:46 | answer | added | Aryeh Kontorovich | timeline score: 10 | |
| Aug 25, 2012 at 22:25 | answer | added | Xarles | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 25, 2012 at 16:04 | answer | added | Per Alexandersson | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 25, 2012 at 4:28 | comment | added | Kaveh | Also blog.computationalcomplexity.org/2005/12/… | |
| Aug 25, 2012 at 4:26 | comment | added | Kaveh | Surprising Results in Complexity: cstheory.stackexchange.com/q/276 | |
| Aug 25, 2012 at 2:43 | answer | added | Scott Aaronson | timeline score: 25 | |
| Mar 16, 2012 at 13:44 | answer | added | Laurent Moret-Bailly | timeline score: 25 | |
| Mar 16, 2012 at 13:29 | history | edited | Robert Kucharczyk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected spelling
|
| Mar 16, 2012 at 13:28 | answer | added | Robert Kucharczyk | timeline score: 22 | |
| Mar 14, 2012 at 21:07 | answer | added | John Jiang | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 14, 2012 at 18:22 | answer | added | none | timeline score: 6 | |
| Mar 14, 2012 at 17:21 | answer | added | Jim Conant | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 14, 2012 at 17:08 | answer | added | Kevin Beanland | timeline score: 8 | |
| Mar 14, 2012 at 16:54 | answer | added | Yemon Choi | timeline score: 8 | |
| Mar 12, 2012 at 17:44 | answer | added | Pait | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 12, 2012 at 16:54 | answer | added | Barry Cipra | timeline score: 26 | |
| Mar 12, 2012 at 7:44 | answer | added | Vladimir Dotsenko | timeline score: 9 | |
| Mar 12, 2012 at 3:50 | answer | added | John Stillwell | timeline score: 24 | |
| Mar 12, 2012 at 1:58 | answer | added | Daniel Moskovich | timeline score: 22 | |
| Mar 12, 2012 at 0:03 | answer | added | William | timeline score: 34 | |
| Mar 11, 2012 at 22:49 | answer | added | gauss | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 11, 2012 at 21:04 | answer | added | Malte | timeline score: 18 | |
| Mar 11, 2012 at 19:41 | answer | added | Rbega | timeline score: 21 | |
| Mar 11, 2012 at 17:43 | history | edited | Robert Kucharczyk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected spelling
|
| Mar 11, 2012 at 17:41 | comment | added | Robert Kucharczyk | Non-Euclidean geometry certainly belongs here, but I am not sure about complex numbers (was not their discovery rather a struggle with unconscious metaphysical assumptions?). I do not know about the other things you mentioned, but it would be great if you took the time to turn that into an answer, with a few explaining sentences. | |
| Mar 11, 2012 at 17:10 | answer | added | Liviu Nicolaescu | timeline score: 28 | |
| Mar 11, 2012 at 13:55 | answer | added | Woett | timeline score: 15 | |
| Mar 11, 2012 at 9:54 | answer | added | user19475 | timeline score: 10 | |
| Mar 11, 2012 at 9:19 | answer | added | Yves | timeline score: 9 | |
| Mar 11, 2012 at 7:02 | answer | added | Not Mike | timeline score: 13 | |
| Mar 11, 2012 at 4:59 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | Non Euclidean geometry, complex numbers, incomparable r.e. Turing degrees below the halting problem, constructions to show the undecidability of certain algebraic problems, especially Tarski's finite Basis problem. Gerhard "Am I Getting Warm Yet?" Paseman, 2012.03.10 | |
| Mar 11, 2012 at 4:09 | answer | added | Misha | timeline score: 40 | |
| Mar 11, 2012 at 3:09 | answer | added | Benjamin Steinberg | timeline score: 13 | |
| Mar 11, 2012 at 2:19 | answer | added | Daniel Moskovich | timeline score: 50 | |
| Mar 11, 2012 at 1:35 | answer | added | Valerio Capraro | timeline score: 52 | |
| Mar 11, 2012 at 1:24 | history | asked | Robert Kucharczyk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |