Timeline for Is there a really big ring of differential operators in characteristic p?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 9, 2012 at 14:13 | comment | added | Lars |
Ah, I wonder which of Bertholot's rings he means, and what precisely is $\delta^{[p]}$. In general, if $\delta$ is an operator of order 1, then $\delta^p=0$ in $\mathcal{D}^{(n)}$ for $n>1$, but not necessarily $\mathcal{D}^{(0)}$ . Modules over$\mathcal{D}^{(0)}$ are connections. Now if by $\delta^{[p]}$ you mean what I wrote as $\delta^{(p}_t$ ,then that′s an operator of order $p$, and cannot be considered as an elementof $\mathcal{D}^{(0)}$ , but if I remember correctly, the same reasoning applies.
|
|
Mar 9, 2012 at 7:44 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | YoungMathematician asks (in a deleted answer) whether ${\partial^{[p]}}^p=0$ holds in Berthelot's ring. | |
Mar 8, 2012 at 18:39 | history | edited | Lars | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Typos
|
Mar 8, 2012 at 15:28 | history | answered | Lars | CC BY-SA 3.0 |