Timeline for How does the Laplace Transform work for circuit analysis? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2013 at 18:00 | history | edited | John | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
In trying to avoid 'how to do the Laplace Transform' I badly framed the question.
|
| Mar 9, 2012 at 18:22 | vote | accept | John | ||
| Mar 8, 2012 at 20:16 | history | closed |
Andreas Blass Yemon Choi Suvrit Qiaochu Yuan Andy Putman |
not a real question | |
| Mar 8, 2012 at 11:47 | answer | added | Liviu Nicolaescu | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 8, 2012 at 9:20 | comment | added | Michael Bächtold | The main question is not well posed. Works for doing what? | |
| Mar 8, 2012 at 0:38 | comment | added | Suvrit | maybe it's also worth mentioning Stieltjes integrals at this point? | |
| Mar 8, 2012 at 0:14 | answer | added | Tom Copeland | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 7, 2012 at 18:46 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | "why the Laplace transform works" - do you mean "why are the usual formulas for Laplace transforms correct"? or "what is the conceptual reason why Laplace transforms turn convolutions into products"? | |
| Mar 7, 2012 at 18:28 | comment | added | Steve Huntsman | As a cartoon, you can view the Laplace transform as a mapping between time and energy representations (this is what the Gibbs distribution is about). Meanwhile, the Fourier transform is a mapping between time and complex frequency representations. | |
| Mar 7, 2012 at 18:17 | comment | added | Terry Tao | $\exp(-st)$ is an eigenfunction of $d/dt$. | |
| Mar 7, 2012 at 17:49 | history | asked | John | CC BY-SA 3.0 |