Timeline for Most interesting mathematics mistake?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26 at 21:15 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Poincare -> Poincaré, while this is on the front page
|
| Oct 21, 2021 at 15:29 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added a Wayback Machine link for the dead link
|
| Feb 22, 2016 at 15:41 | comment | added | Samuel Lelièvre | Stallings's page went down. The paper is at web.archive.org/web/20140630032821/http://math.berkeley.edu/… | |
| Nov 7, 2013 at 14:50 | comment | added | Joël | There is also a paper by Cartier with a similar title: "Comment l'hypothèse de Riemann ne fut pas prouvée." | |
| Dec 15, 2009 at 21:22 | comment | added | Ryan Budney | Whitehead's similar mistake is very interesting, too, as it lead him to the construction of contractible 3-manifolds that aren't balls. | |
| Dec 15, 2009 at 19:14 | history | answered | HJRW | CC BY-SA 2.5 |