Timeline for Stone-Čech compactification of $\mathbb R$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Mar 4, 2012 at 15:35 | comment | added | George Lowther | So $\beta X\setminus U=\beta(X\setminus U)$ for all locally compact $X$ and relatively compact open $U$. Looks good to me. | |
Mar 4, 2012 at 14:56 | comment | added | Matthew Daws | @George, @BS: I've added the hypothesis that U is relatively compact. Thanks! George's 2nd comment is what's works for general $U$; and so I guess if $U$ isn't relatively compact, then $\beta X\setminus U$ is not $\beta(X\setminus U)$. | |
Mar 4, 2012 at 14:55 | history | edited | Matthew Daws | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 70 characters in body
|
Mar 4, 2012 at 14:34 | history | edited | Matthew Daws | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added hypothesis to (hopefully) correct argument
|
Mar 4, 2012 at 10:32 | comment | added | George Lowther | I think $C(\beta X\setminus U)$ should be identified with $C_b(X)/C_0(U)$. | |
Mar 4, 2012 at 10:29 | comment | added | BS. | I think $U$ is implicitly assumed relatively compact: "... then $F\in C_0(X)$" | |
Mar 4, 2012 at 9:44 | comment | added | George Lowther | So, why doesn't this argument also work for $U=X$? | |
Mar 4, 2012 at 9:05 | vote | accept | Mariarty | ||
Mar 4, 2012 at 8:35 | comment | added | Matthew Daws | In some sense this is nothing but a careful elaboration of George Lowther's hint! | |
Mar 4, 2012 at 8:33 | history | answered | Matthew Daws | CC BY-SA 3.0 |