Timeline for Is there anything special about the Riemann surface $y^2 = x(x^{10}+11x^5-1)$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2023 at 6:12 | history | edited | Tito Piezas III | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
8th powers
|
| Apr 27, 2023 at 4:02 | history | edited | Tito Piezas III | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Clarified a factor of an icosahedral invariant
|
| Apr 27, 2023 at 3:47 | history | edited | Tito Piezas III | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed small typo
|
| Apr 27, 2023 at 3:39 | history | edited | Tito Piezas III | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added some details
|
| Apr 26, 2023 at 19:56 | history | edited | R.P. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Apr 26, 2023 at 13:48 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Displaying displayed formulæ, while this is on the front page
|
| Mar 1, 2012 at 19:38 | history | edited | Tito Piezas III | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Minor changes, and added a link.
|
| Mar 1, 2012 at 15:31 | history | edited | Tito Piezas III | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added Postscript.
|
| Mar 1, 2012 at 14:28 | vote | accept | Tito Piezas III | ||
| Mar 1, 2012 at 14:28 | comment | added | Tito Piezas III | Oh, goodness, how could I have made that typo? Yes, $x^{10}+11x^5-1$ was what I had in mind. Thanks, Prof. Elkies! | |
| Mar 1, 2012 at 7:00 | answer | added | Noam D. Elkies | timeline score: 47 | |
| Mar 1, 2012 at 5:59 | history | edited | Noam D. Elkies | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected formula for icosahedral polynomial ($11x^5$, not $11x$)
|
| Mar 1, 2012 at 5:58 | comment | added | Noam D. Elkies | I ventured to change $11x$ to $11x^5$ since that's what's needed to get the icosahedral polynomial. | |
| Feb 29, 2012 at 21:10 | comment | added | roy smith | The maximum number of automorphisms for a curve of genus 5 is 192. It is easy to show there is no automorphism of order 7, by looking at the map onto the putative quotient by such an automorphism. | |
| Feb 29, 2012 at 13:56 | vote | accept | Tito Piezas III | ||
| Mar 1, 2012 at 14:28 | |||||
| Feb 29, 2012 at 13:42 | comment | added | JSE | It seems more likely to me that the Jacobian of this curve has extra endomorphisms than that the curve itself has a lot of extra automorphisms. | |
| Feb 29, 2012 at 13:17 | history | edited | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body; edited tags; added 6 characters in body
|
| Feb 29, 2012 at 10:49 | answer | added | Francesco Polizzi | timeline score: 24 | |
| Feb 29, 2012 at 8:48 | history | edited | Tito Piezas III | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added some details
|
| Feb 29, 2012 at 8:35 | history | edited | Tito Piezas III | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Minor typo
|
| Feb 29, 2012 at 8:30 | history | asked | Tito Piezas III | CC BY-SA 3.0 |