Timeline for largest Lyapunov exponent
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2012 at 12:40 | comment | added | Joachim | Sure, equal almost everywhere. Thanks for your comments! | |
| Feb 28, 2012 at 2:01 | comment | added | Helge | Equal almost everywhere, but not equal ;-) These are two very different notions. There are certain theorems that analyze when convergence is everywhere, the basic conclusion is that then the Lyapunov exponent vanishes (can't think of the names right now). | |
| Feb 28, 2012 at 1:59 | history | edited | Helge | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Feb 27, 2012 at 23:18 | comment | added | Joachim | Sorry, the term 1/n is missing. Besides this, two things should be equal when we work with ergodic measure | |
| Feb 27, 2012 at 23:03 | comment | added | Helge | My integral gives the largest Lyapunov exponent. Without the integral it doesn't. Just take the base dynamics random, and choose a periodic point. | |
| Feb 27, 2012 at 23:02 | history | edited | Helge | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Feb 27, 2012 at 21:32 | comment | added | Joachim | Thanks for answering. In particular, the above expression or the integral form you wrote always gives the largest exponent. Am I right? | |
| Feb 27, 2012 at 21:15 | history | answered | Helge | CC BY-SA 3.0 |