Timeline for intersection cohomology when the resolution is not semi-small
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2009 at 13:35 | comment | added | Puraṭci Vinnani | thank you very much, The decomposition theorem was what I was looking for (I didn't remember it at the time, and when I was searching on google for things on IC it didn't come up for some reason). I'm sorry for posting a silly question like this, I should have been more patient and asked someone in person instead. | |
| Dec 22, 2009 at 13:32 | vote | accept | Puraṭci Vinnani | ||
| Dec 16, 2009 at 2:37 | comment | added | Mike Skirvin | I'm not sure if I'm aware of a description of the other summands in this case. I'd be happy to read an answer explaining this if you're up for it. | |
| Dec 16, 2009 at 2:29 | comment | added | Alexander Woo | The decomposition theorem also says something about what the other summands look like. | |
| Dec 15, 2009 at 7:58 | history | answered | Mike Skirvin | CC BY-SA 2.5 |