Skip to main content
Image link broken; now fixed.
Source Link
Joseph O'Rourke
  • 150.9k
  • 36
  • 358
  • 958

I was having difficulty seeing Nathaniel Shar's (interesting!) pattern. This might be easier to interpret:
      fib500 inverted http://cs.smith.edu/%7Eorourke/MathOverflow/fib500.giffib500 inverted
(I thought it too intrusive to add this directly to his answer.)

I was having difficulty seeing Nathaniel Shar's (interesting!) pattern. This might be easier to interpret:
      fib500 inverted http://cs.smith.edu/%7Eorourke/MathOverflow/fib500.gif
(I thought it too intrusive to add this directly to his answer.)

I was having difficulty seeing Nathaniel Shar's (interesting!) pattern. This might be easier to interpret:
      fib500 inverted
(I thought it too intrusive to add this directly to his answer.)

Source Link
Joseph O'Rourke
  • 150.9k
  • 36
  • 358
  • 958

I was having difficulty seeing Nathaniel Shar's (interesting!) pattern. This might be easier to interpret:
      fib500 inverted http://cs.smith.edu/%7Eorourke/MathOverflow/fib500.gif
(I thought it too intrusive to add this directly to his answer.)