Timeline for On successive regular cardinals with no ladders
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2021 at 22:29 | vote | accept | Asaf Karagila♦ | ||
| Feb 21, 2020 at 20:27 | answer | added | Asaf Karagila♦ | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 21, 2020 at 13:07 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removed capitals from title (the question was bumped anyway)
|
| Feb 21, 2020 at 11:50 | history | edited | Asaf Karagila♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Feb 21, 2020 at 11:48 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Feb 21, 2020 at 11:49 | |||||
| Jul 25, 2012 at 22:13 | comment | added | Asaf Karagila♦ | I should probably remark that discussing it with several people in one set theory seminar we concluded that finitely many inaccessibles would be enough for finitely many regular successors without ladders; but it was well-pointed that if we want to get it done for all successors, Woodin cardinals join the game to allow changing the successor of singular cardinals. I don't remember whether or not we found a solution for just "infinitely many successors don't have ladders", but I believe it would be relatively simple. | |
| Feb 17, 2012 at 20:04 | history | asked | Asaf Karagila♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |